The Economist mag, in its 24th-30th 2011 issue, has an article discussing the investigations of psychologists into peoples’ reactions to dilemmas like the Trolley Problem september.


The Economist mag, in its 24th-30th 2011 issue, has an article discussing the investigations of psychologists into peoples’ reactions to dilemmas like the Trolley Problem september.

One of many classic practices used determine an individual’s willingness to act in a way that is utilitarian referred to as trolleyology.

The topic of the research is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All choices that are involve every one of that leads to people’s fatalities. As an example; you will find five railway workmen into the course of a runaway carriage. The guys will certainly be killed unless the topic of the test, a bystander within the tale, does one thing. The niche is told he’s for a connection on the tracks. Close to him is a large, hefty complete stranger. The topic is informed that his body that is own would too light to end the train, but that when he pushes the stranger on the songs, the complete stranger’s big human anatomy stop the train and conserve the five life. That, unfortuitously, would destroy the complete stranger. P. 102

The Economist reports that just 10% of experimental topics are able to put the complete stranger beneath the train. I suspect it might be less, if the topics discovered on their own in an actual situation, in the place of a pretend experimental test. 続きを読む “The Economist mag, in its 24th-30th 2011 issue, has an article discussing the investigations of psychologists into peoples’ reactions to dilemmas like the Trolley Problem september.”